The Real Purple Deal by Oana S. Stavila

started, written, on August 14, 2020, update on February 6, 2021

Introduction to the world of PURPLE DEAL by Oana S. Stavila

What does The Real Purple Deal mean and WHY was it created? to HELP PEOPLE, that's FIRST!

Because... imagination, COVID 19, Coronavirus, Trump Virus, China virus, Hoax virus, call it what you want, jokingly or seriously, but, in REALITY, to CONTRIBUTE to your well-being and the education of those who did not have access to it or, they do not know how to do much better in life.

What are we talking about? It's all like in fashion.

FASHION, or, we can call it OLD FASHION or OLD FASHIONED, as we should all be: EDUCATED. Educated to RESPECT each other; educated so that they cannot be fooled.

I've always said anytime, anyone and anywhere, that in fashion, there's nothing left that can be invented. You can no longer invent colors, buttons, feathers, synthetic or natural fibers and all other accessories that today are part of fashion, as no one can invent NEW MODELS of blazers, blouses, skirts, pants, hats, dresses, etc.

Everything was INVENTED long ago, long before we had any idea what the world meant or existed on this planet. Who TODAY, says he/she is a fashion designer, or declares himself/herself pompous fashion designer, super-extra-mega-fabulous that he 'invented' something in a field where you can NOT invent anything (like eco fashion, that dressing in toilet paper has already been 'invented'), is just a boaster. Being a fashion designer is a profession like any other, in which you go on certain patterns already established and invented by others.

Yes, I admit, and here comes true creation, it's about imagination, good taste, refinement, talent in combining colors and fabrics, dexterity and, all of this leading to that essential uniqueness in the creative process.

Humanity has been smart, much smarter than we are, the fast food generation, fast sex, fast-everything, those who today pretend to want the good of mankind, pretend to be smart, but they no longer have time, because time has compressed into the internet life, life through the Internet, which is neither normal nor real, nor should it represent us and, even less under NO circumstances should it influence our lives.

Are we all the same? YES and NO! And everyone agrees with that.

NO, although we are all created the same; YES, because we have the same organs and the same percentage of water and blood in our bodies!

how are we different?

Through our brains, our ability to judge and, if we are to judge very simplistically, we are divided into good and evil. Why are some people bad? I'll never understand them, except I can pity them and consider them mentally ill.

Clearly, from my idea, once put into practice on a national and, by implication, international scale, they will all benefit, bad or good at the same time. And, I'm extremely curious to see exactly which party in America will put it into practice, because it will be definitely beneficial to the people, but also to the image of the party and the people who represent it.

I have a PROPOSAL, actually SEVERAL IN ONE, and, as you will see, this article is actually composed of several parts because, in my humble opinion and experience, I do not want to bore anyone with too long stories that may take away your precious time spent in the company of loved ones, family, those that really matter, so, can be read in order of the appearance of information.

As I said above, everything, at least in certain areas, has already been INVENTED and NO ONE can claim the 'right' to say that it is innovative, inventor.

So, I'm not an inventor either, but I'm inventive.

You know? I write ONLY what I feel and think, I do not write to anyone's command, I am NOT anyone's product, I am NOT the fruit of anyone's work and I have never been, no one has ever imposed on me what to do, how to write or behave in real life, apart from my parents and grandparents, that is, the education I received from home and school; on top of that I write on impulse! And now I have come up with a very constructive idea, I say, but very REAL, which we all can put into practice; hard, very hard, for some, because we have to re-educate ourselves with this new scourge that has changed the course of our lives, but better than the perspective that is 'offered' to us, because real solutions about how to manage our life, finances, no one offers us, except for a fee. Of course, some governments help as much as they think they can, but still insufficient in the medium and long term.

What I'm proposing is medium- and long-term aid, without government aid, rather than a partnership between government and population, and possibly corporations, (because the project can become something very big, big, besides the main idea, which is why I said it's more ideas in one) so, minimum costs, maximum results, with will and education. And, most importantly, job creation.

There are, as we know, people all over the world who live below the poverty line, instead, there are others (and I don't mean the super rich), who neither realize how lucky they are, nor value what they have, because until now they have been convinced that democracy lasts forever and, the market economy also, being, from the point of view of some, something mandatory, just because they had the privilege of being born and raised in economically developed countries. Things have changed, as we all know, since last year. Businesses went bankrupt, regardless of their size, people had to model themselves according to the "demands" of the new market.

Who dictates the market? We know, we believe, that someone else, the people who deal with these things, but we don't realize that, in fact, we, the consumers, the great mass of the population are the ones who "dictate" to the consumer market. Without our purchasing power, there is no outlet, because, logically, everything gets stuck.

If we, the consumers, can't buy, the sellers, the producers, including the state, end up getting stuck. And, we don't want that, we're all aware.

Have you thought about how we can help this not happen?

America is a proud people, built mostly by and out of immigrants. Recently, the US has allocated huge funds to build a wall on the border with Mexico. Why does America need a wall of protection against immigrants, even though there is very clear legislation in this regard and, on the economic and financial side, there are agreements between the States? Let's study the statistics and see what the cause is and if in reality we can do something about it.

Can we Americans, ordinary citizens, do something for Mexicans and other Peoples of Latin America so that they do not endanger their lives and health, primarily in an attempt to reach, illegally, in a new country, the source of the mirage of the entire planet? The answer is YES, we can, and that means that we will not only help the American State to redistribute that money allocated for the construction of the wall, but we will also help other people, our fellow human beings less favoured than ourselves, and at the same time we will help ourselves, and our families, re-educate our will, kindness, civic spirit and, why not, even cultivating a "collective hygiene" (to call it that , as it's all fashionable washing hands).

Now I will quote from WIKIPEDIA what I have studied about Mexico, published data on the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed on December 17, 1992 by President George Bush, between the US, Canada and Mexico.

Mexico. neighbors: to the South, Guatemala and Belize, to the North, the U.S.A.

Political system: federal presidential republic, with capital in Mexico City which has more than 19 million inhabitants.

Population estimate in 2017: 130,526,945

It is classified as a medium-high income economy with a GDP of over a trillion U.S. dollars, the 14th largest economy in the world. It is the fourth largest oil producer in the world. The mixed economy is based on industry and services, but there is a strong agricultural sector, although it has a desertous land, the southern parts have tropical climate, being located under the Tropic of Cancer.

Due to the NAFTA agreement, trade with the U.S. and CANADA has tripled since 1994. But it seems that there are still various structural problems: low wages, an uneven distribution of incomes and reduced opportunities for the southern states, which have a large Native American population. Geographical inequalities are also a main problem: parts of the federal district have a standard of living similar to that of Italy and, it seems, Wikipedia says, corruption is one of the problems there.

NAFTA covers a market of 375 million consumers, with the prospect of expanding to the south of the American continent, and an area of 21.3 million square kilometers. the aim of this agreement was to liberalise trade in products and services, by removing tariff and non-tariff barriers between the parties and by liberalizing intra-zonal investments.

Areas covered by NAFTA: trade in material goods, trade in services, direct capital-liberalization investments, competition rules, temporary stay of businessmen, intellectual property, certain aspects of environmental protection. NAFTA is a large-scale free trade agreement, has no natural political idea and is an intergovernmental cooperation model.

NAFTA appears as a modern approach and a continuity of the open road in the post-war period by two famous precursors: AUTOPACT and FTA.

The Free Trade Agreement signed in 1965 between Canada and the U.S. eliminated customs duties on cars manufactured in one of the two countries and shipped to the other country.

FTA, in 1996, customs duties disappeared in the mutual trade in machines, machinery, computers, furniture, paper, oil, so that since 1998, there are no customs duties on medicines, clothing and food.

Comparison between NAFTA and EEC (European Union)

One difference is the political one. The European community market is an intermediate step towards political unity. The EEC demands that nations be stable democracies before entering the community. NAFTA does not follow this, an example of this being the criticisms of the Mexican political system. For Mexico, agriculture was a sensitive area and therefore a separate agreement was negotiated with the US, and another with Canada. NAFTA regulates tariff, non-tariff and investment barriers.

Import goods from the other two nations will have the same regime as national goods.

The U.S. demand was that the free movement of people, except professionals and managers, should not be allowed. This is the result of the US fear that it will be overwhelmed by millions of poor people in Mexico.

USA and CANADA have gained access to the Mexican market, a market with over 80 million people. The non-economic benefits for the USA can also be specified, being the improvement of Mexico's external relations and possible internal stability, with a view to better cooperation in the field of drugs, emigration and pollution. That's what NAFTA meant.

I made a brief presentation of some information about Mexico. Of course, the same elements must be taken into account for the other Latin American countries. Why did I do that? Because from some statistical data (which I have not yet studied), I can get to what interests the common population and my idea.

We all know that the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of a country is a macroeconomic indicator that reflects the sum of the market value of all goods and services intended for final consumption, produced in all branches of the economy within a country within a year, and that it can also be calculated at the level of a region or locality.

Gross Domestic Product is the sum of consumption expenses of private households and private non-profit organizations, state expenditure, investments for storage purposes as well as export gains from which import expenses are deducted.

Economists divided the term general consumption into two parts: private consumption and public sector spending.

What interests me is private consumption, which is normally the largest component of GDP, representing household spending in the economy. These expenses can be classified into: perishable goods, services and durable goods. Examples: rents, jewelry, food.

Versiunea in limba romana

Introducere in lumea PURPLE DEAL by Oana S.

Ce inseamna The Real Purple Deal si DE CE a fost creata? Deoarece ... imaginatie, COVID 19, Coronavirus, Trump Virus, China virus, Hoax virus, spuneti-i cum vreti, in gluma sau in serios, dar, REAL, pentru a CONTRIBUI la binele TAU si la educatia celor care NU au avut acces la ea sau, nu stiu cum sa se descurce mult mai bine in viata.

Despre ce vorbim? Totul e ca in moda, FASHION, sau, putem sa o spunem OLD FASHION sau OLD FASHIONED, asa cum ar TREBUI sa fim cu totii: EDUCATI; educati pentru a ne respecta unii pe altii; educati pentru a NU putea fi prostiti;

Intotdeauna am spus ORIUNDE, ORICUI si ORICAND ca, in moda, NU mai exista nimic care sa poata fi inventat. Nu mai poti inventa culorile, nasturii, penele, fibrele sintetice sau naturale si toate celelalte accesorii care azi, sunt parte din moda, asa cum NIMENI NU mai poate inventa NOI MODELE de rochii, bluze, fuste, palarii, pantaloni, sacouri, etc. TOTUL a fost INVENTAT DEMULT, cu mult inainte ca noi sa avem habar ce inseamna lumea sau sa existam pe aceasta planeta. Cine AZI, spune ca este creator de moda, sau se declara pompos fashion designer, super-extra-mega-fabulos ca a 'inventat' ceva intr-un domeniu in care NU se mai poate inventa NIMIC (ca si moda eco, ca a te imbraca in hartie igienica a fost deja 'inventat"), este doar un laudaros. A fi creator de moda este o meserie ca oricare alta, in care mergi pe anumite tipare deja stabilite si inventate de altii. Da, recunosc, si aici vine adevarata creatie, e vorba despre imaginatie, bun gust, rafinament, talent in combinarea culorilor si a tesaturilor, dexteritate si, toate astea ducand la acea unicitate esentiala in procesul creator.

Omenirea a fost desteapta, mult mai desteapta decat suntem noi, generatia fast-food, fast-sex, fast-everything, cei care azi pretindem ca vrem binele omenirii, pretindem ca suntem destepti, dar nu mai avem timp, deoarece timpul s-a comprimat in viata internauta, viata prin internet, care NU e nici normala, nici reala, si nici NU ar trebui sa ne reprezinte si, cu atat mai putin, in niciun caz, NU ar trebui sub nicio forma sa ne influenteze vietile.

Noi toti suntem la fel? DA si NU! si toti sunt de acord cu asta. NU, desi toti suntem creati la fel; DA, deoarece avem aceleasi organe si acelasi procentaj de apa si sange in corp! prin ce suntem diferiti? Prin creierul nostru, capacitatea fiecaruia de a judeca si, daca e sa judecam foarte simplist, suntem impartiti in buni si rai. De ce sunt unii oameni rai? Nu am sa-i inteleg niciodata, decat pot sa ii compatimesc si sa ii consider cu probleme de natura mentala. In mod clar, de ideea mea, odata pusa in practica la scara nationala si, implicit, internationala, vor beneficia cu totii, rai sau buni deopotriva. Si, sunt extrem de curioasa sa vad exact care partid din America o va pune in practica, deoarece va fi benefica in mod categoric pentru oameni, dar, si pentru imaginea partidului si oamenii care il reprezinta.

Am o propunere, de fapt mai multe intr-una singura, si, precum veti vedea, acest articol este de fapt compus din mai multe parti deoarece, dupa umila mea parere si experienta, nu vreau sa plictisesc pe nimeni cu povesti prea lungi care, poate va rapesc din timpul pretios petrecut in compania persoanelor iubite, a familiei, a celor care cu adevarat conteaza, asa ca, va putea fi citit in ordinea aparitiei informatiei.

Asa cum spuneam mai sus, totul, cel putin in anumite domenii, a fost deja INVENTAT si NIMENI NU isi mai poate aroga 'dreptul' de a spune ca este inovator, inventator.

Asa ca, nici eu nu sunt inventator, dar, sunt inventiva.

Stiti? Eu scriu DOAR ceea ce simt si gandesc, NU scriu la comanda nimanui, NU sunt produsul nimanui, NU sunt rodul muncii al cuiva si nici nu am fost vreodata, nimeni nu mi-a impus niciodata ce sa fac, cum sa scriu sau sa ma comport in viata reala, in afara de parintii si bunicii mei, adica educatia primita de acasa si cea scolara; pe deasupra scriu din IMPULS! Iar acum mi-a venit o IDEE foarte constructiva, zic eu, dar foarte REALA, pe care noi, cu totii, o putem pune in practica; greu, foarte greu,pentru unii, deoarece trebuie sa ne reeducam odata cu acest nou flagel care ne-a schimbat cursul vietii, dar mai bine decat perspectiva care ni se 'ofera', deoarece SOLUTII reale despre cum sa ne gestionam viata, finantele, NU ne ofera nimeni, decat contra cost. Desigur, unele guverne ajuta cat considera ca pot, dar, totusi, insuficient pe termen mediu si lung. Ceea ce propun eu, este ajutor pe termen mediu si lung, fara ajutor guvernamental, decat un parteneriat intre guvern si populatie, si, eventual, corporatii, (deoarece proiectul poate deveni ceva foarte mare, de amploare, pe langa ideea principala, tocmai de aceea ziceam ca e vorba de mai multe idei intr-una singura) deci, costuri minime, rezultate maxime, cu vointa si educatie. Si, foarte important, creare de locuri de munca.

Exista, precum stim, oameni in intreaga lume care traiesc sub limita saraciei, in schimb, exista altii (si nu ma refer acum la cei super bogati), care nici nu realizeaza cat sunt de norocosi, nici nu pretuiesc ceea ce ei au, deoarece, pana acum au fost convinsi ca democratia dureaza la infinit si, economia de piata, de asemenea, fiind, din punctul unora de vedere, ceva obligatoriu, doar fiindca au avut privilegiul de a se fi nascut si crescut in tari dezvoltate economic. Lucrurile s-au schimbat, precum stim cu totii, incepand cu anul trecut. Afaceri au falimentat, indiferent de marimea lor, oamenii au trebuit sa se modeleze dupa "cerintele" noii piete.

Cine dicteaza piata? Stim, credem ca altcineva, cei care se ocupa cu aceste lucruri, dar, nu realizam ca, de fapt, noi, consumatorii, marea masa a populatiei suntem cei care "dictam" pietei de consum. Fara puterea noastra de cumparare nu exista piata de desfacere, deoarece, logic, totul se blocheaza.

Daca noi, consumatorii, nu putem cumpara, vanzatorii, producatorii, inclusiv statul, ajung sa se blocheze. Si, nu vrem asta, suntem constienti cu totii.

V-ati gandit cum putem ajuta ca acest lucru sa nu se intample?

America este un popor mandru, construit in majoritate de si din imigranti. Recent, USA a alocat fonduri uriase pentru constructia unui zid la granita cu Mexicul. De ce are nevoie America de un zid de protectie impotriva imigrantilor, desi exista o legislatie foarte clara in aceasta privinta iar, pe partea economico-financiara exista acorduri intre State? Haideti sa studiem statisticile sa vedem care este cauza si, daca in realitate putem face ceva in acest sens.

Putem noi, Americanii, cetatenii de rand, sa facem ceva pentru Mexicani si pentru alte popoare din America Latina pentru ca ei sa NU isi mai pericliteze viata si sanatatea, in primul rand in incercarea de a ajunge ilegal intr-o tara noua, sursa mirajului intregii planete? Raspunsul este DA, putem, si asta inseamna ca nu doar ca vom ajuta Statul American pentru a redistribui acei bani alocati pentru constructia zidului, ci vom ajuta si alti oameni, semenii nostri mai putin favorizati decat noi si, in acelasi timp, ne vom ajuta si pe noi insine, si familiile noastre, reeducandu-ne vointa, bunatatea, spiritul civic si, de ce nu, chiar cultivarea unei "igiene colective" (ca sa o numesc asa, ca tot e la moda spalatul pe maini).

Acum voi cita din WIKIPEDIA ceea ce am studiat despre MEXIC, date publicate cu privire la Acordul Nord-American de Comert Liber, semnat la 17 Decembrie 1992 de catre Presedintele George Bush, intre SUA, Canada si Mexic.

MEXIC. vecini: la Sud, Guatemala si Belize, la Nord, U.S.A.

Sistem politic: republica federala prezidentiala, cu capitala la Ciudad de Mexico care are peste 19 milioane de locuitori.

Estimare populatie in 2017: 130.526.945

Este clasificata ca si economie cu venit mediu-ridicat, cu un PIB de peste un trilion de dolari USA, a XIV a cea mai mare economie din lume. Economia mixta este bazata pe industrie si servicii, dar exista un sector agricol puternic, desi are un teren desertos, partile de sud au clima tropicala, fiind situate sub Tropicul Racului. Este al patrulea cel mai mare producator de titei din lume.

Datorita intelegerii NAFTA, comertul cu SUA si CANADA s-a triplat din 1994. Dar, se pare ca inca mai exista diverse probleme structurale: salarii mici, o distributie neuniforma a veniturilor si oportunitati reduse pentru statele din sud, care au o populatie amerindiana numeroasa. Inegalitatile geografice sunt de asemenea o problema principala: parti ale districtului federal au un nivel de trai similar cu cel al Italiei si, se pare ca, zice Wikipedia, coruptia este una dintre problemele de acolo.

NAFTA acopera o piata de 375 milioane de consumatori, cu perspectiva extinderii si spre sudul contonentului american, si o suprafata de 21,3 milioane km patrati. scopul acestui acord a fost liberalizarea comertului cu produse si servicii, prin eliminarea barierelor tarifare si netarifare intre parti si prin liberalizarea investitiilor intra-zonale.

Domenii vizate de NAFTA: comertul cu bunuri materiale, comertul cu servicii, investitii directe de capital-liberalizare, reguli de concurenta, sejurul temporar al oamenilor de afaceri, proprietate intelectuala, anumite aspecte privitoare la protectia mediului. NAFTA este un acord de liber schimb de mare anvergura, nu are idee naturala politica si este un model de cooperare de tip interguvernamental.

NAFTA apare ca o abordare moderna si o continuitate a drumului deschis in perioada postbelica de doi precursori celebri: AUTOPACT si FTA.

Acordul de Comert Liber semnat in 1965 intre Canada si SUA a eliminat taxele vamale pentru autoturismele fabricate in una din cele doua tari si expediate in cealalta tara.

FTA, in 1996, taxele vamale au disparut in comertul reciproc cu masini si utilaje, calculatoare, mobila, hartie, titei, pentru ca din 1998, sa nu mai existe taxe vamale nici la medicamente, confectii si produse alimentare.

Comparatia dintre NAFTA cu CEE (Uniunea Europeana)

O diferenta este cea politica. Piata Comuna Europeana este un pas intermediar catre unitatea politica. CEE cere ca natiunile sa fie niste democratii stabile, inainte de a intra in comunitate. NAFTA NU urmareste acest lucru, un exemplu in acest sens fiind si criticile sistemului politic mexican. Pentru Mexic, agricultura a reprezentat un domeniu sensibil si, de aceea, a fost negociat un acord separat cu SUA, si un altul cu Canada. NAFTA reglementeaza barierele tarifare, netarifare si investitiile.

marfurile de import provenite din celelalte doua natiuni vor avea acelasi regim ca si bunurile nationale.

Cererea SUA a fost ca miscarea libera a persoanelor, cu exceptia profesionistilor si managerilor, sa NU fie permisa. Acest lucru este rezultatul temerii USA ca va fi coplesita de milioane de saraci din Mexic.

USA si CANADA a castigat accesul la piata mexicana, o piata cu peste 80 de milioane de oameni. Pot fi specificate si beneficiile neeconomice pentru USA, fiind vorba de imbunatatirea relatiilor externe ale Mexicului si de o posibila stabilitate interna, urmarindu-se o mai buna cooperare in domeniul drogurilor, emigrarii si poluarii. Asta a insemnat NAFTA.

Am facut o scurta prezentare a unor informatii despre Mexic. Desigur, trebuiesc luate in considerare, aceleasi elemente si pentru celelalte tari din America Latina. De ce am facut asta? Deoarece din niste date statistice (pe care inca nu le-am studiat), putem ajunge la ceea ce intereseaza populatia de rand si ideea mea.

Stim cu totii ca Produsul Intern Brut (PIB) al unei tari, este un indicator macroeconomic care reflecta suma valorii de piata a tuturor marfurilor si serviciilor destinate consumului final, produse in toate ramurile economiei in interiorul unei tari in decurs de un an, si ca, se poate calcula si la nivelul unei regiuni sau localitati.

PIB ul este suma cheltuielilor pentru consum a gospodariilor private si a organizatiilor private non-profit, a cheltuielilor statului, a investitiilor in scopul depozitarii ca si castigurile din export din care se scad cheltuielile pentru importuri.

Economistii au impartit termenul de consum general in doua parti: consumul privat si cheltuielile sectorului public.

Ceea ce ma intereseaza pe mine este CONSUMUL PRIVAT, care, este in mod normal cea mai mare componenta a PIB, reprezentand cheltuielile gospodariilor in economie. Aceste cheltuieli pot fi clasificate in: bunuri perisabile, servicii si bunuri durabile. Exemple: chirii, bijuterii, hrana.

Omul distruge ecosistemele. Am vazut aceasta ABERATIE reprezentata in perioada "lockdown" prin poze sau filmulete care NE ARATAU cat au devenit de "clare" apele si cat de fericiti 'zburda' in apele stravezii, delfinii. Desigur, normal ca iubesc delfinii, ca doar NU o sa iubesc rechinii, soarecii sau liliecii. Am vazut o multime de PROSTI INCONSTIENTI care erau fericiti sa posteze astfel de lucruri, in schimb despre UCIDEREA in masa a POPULATIEI sub pretextul "curatirii" planetei. Pai, bai, "desteptilor", voi cei care postati asa ceva si sunteti spalati pe creier, DE CE acceptati TAIEREA PADURILOR, VANZAREA RESURSELOR NATURALE pe NIMIC tocmai catre CEI care va spala creierul spunandu-va ca E MAI BINE SA MOARA OAMENI pentru "a renaste planeta"! Daca ei vor sa renasca planeta, sa apere ecosistemul.

DE CE exista lupta pentru putere, pe viata si pe moartea voastra, a noastra, a tuturor celor folositi de ei pentru a obtine PUTEREA?

Atat de multe teorii ale conspiratiei, teorii pro si contra, cand, de fapt TOTUL este despre LUPTA pentru PUTERE, BANI, SUPREMATIE, POLITICA! Convingerile "politice", de fapt NU sunt politice, deoarece NIMIC NU mai pare facut despre OMENIRE, pentru OAMENI si CU OAMENI, ci doar despre prosti, cu prosti si cu cei super bogati care, in lacomia lor nemarginita, NU mai pun niciun pret pe umanitate.

Iubesc delfinii, focile, regnul animal, vegetal, etc, dar... DE CE A TREBUIT SA MOARA OAMENI pentru ca unii sa ne arate ca "ecosistemul s-a curatat", ca "planeta a devenit mai curata"? Asa cum spuneam mai sus, totul, cel putin in anumite domenii, a fost deja INVENTAT si NIMENI NU isi mai poate aroga 'dreptul' de a spune ca este inovator, inventator. Omenirea a fost desteapta, mult mai desteapta decat suntem noi, generatia fast-food, fast-sex, fast-everything, cei care azi pretindem ca vrem binele omenirii, pretindem ca suntem destepti, dar nu mai avem timp, deoarece timpul s-a comprimat in viata internauta care NU e nici normala, nici reala, si nici NU ar trebui sa ne reprezinte si, cu atat mai putin, in niciun caz NU ar trebui sub nicio forma sa ne influenteze vietile.

DE CE "trebuie" sa moara oameni pentru ca noi sa vedem pe internet, virtual, (deoarece altfel NU ne permitem si oricum NU suntem lasati, pentru ca era lock down sau va mai fi!) ca delfinii inoata veseli in ape limpezi in timp ce batranii nostri, cei care STIU ce inseamna viata FARA google, FARA internet, FARA social media, care au muncit pamantul, cei care au inventat totul, tot ceea ce noi azi folosim, care ne-au crescut frumos, care au stiut sa iubeasca si sa pretuiasca viata REAL, cu bune sau rele, dar, FARA interventia artificialului in viata noastra, AU MURIT, au fost INJECTATI si OMORATI sau lasati intentionat sa moara, au fost INGROPATI NECRESTINESTE, sau arsi, cum doar cei din perioada ciumei bubonice au mai fost, dar, in schimb, noua ni se spune ca "virusul NU trece printr-o masca" din panza care ne sufoca, exact ca intregul sistem de TEROARE si FRICA, CREAT INTENTIONAT pentru a pune stapanire si control asupra mintii umane si a tot ceea ce inseamna fiinta si demnitate umana?

Noi toti suntem la fel? NU! si toti sunt de acord cu asta, desi toti suntem creati la fel, avem aceleasi organe si acelasi procentaj de apa si sange in corp!

Ai primit o DEROGARE de la purtarea mastii daca ai astm sau alte probleme respiratorii? NU!

Pentru ca cei care IMPUN, fortat aceste reguli absurde NU se gandesc la tine, la mine, la noi!

Am O PROPUNERE, dar de fapt mai multe, pe care le veti citi pe acest blog, in "THE REAL PURPLE DEAL!" Stiti? Eu scriu DOAR ceea ce simt si gandesc, NU scriu la comanda nimanui, si, pe deasupra scriu din IMPULS! Iar acum mi-a venit o IDEE foarte nastrusnica, dar foarte REALA pe care noi, cu totii, o putem pune in practica; greu, foarte greu, dar mai bine decat perspectiva sumbra care ni se 'ofera', deoarece SOLUTII NU ne ofera nimeni, decat povestea mult prea rasuflata cu "purtati masca, distantare sociala si spalatul pe maini"! In primul rand, distantarea sociala (s-o fi vrut o expresie mai elevata, dar este extrem de incorecta, elaborata in laboratoarele psihologiei umane) este un termen care din start ne indica o distantare umana fata de semenii nostri; socializarea face parte din noi, din umanitate; fara ea, suntem SINGURI, fiinte inadaptabile care pot doar privi delfinii fericiti cum inoata in apele limpezi, in timp ce NOI, UMANITATE, NU mai traim, NU mai putem respira LIBER, NU ne mai putem exprima LIBER deoarece asa au hotarat unii, iar altii, spalati pe creier care, in loc sa inoate alaturi de delfini, executa; inteleg sa vrei sa o numesti distantare medicala de scurta durata, dar NU poti INOCULA in constiinta colectiva TEAMA fata de oameni, TEAMA fata de propria familie (pentru ipohondrici, sau mult prea ocrotitori). Man destroys ecosystems